Development Opinion Your Views — 31 December 2011
Opinion: What’s the rush on the waterfront?

To the editor:

Maybe I missed it, but nowhere in the present waterfront contretemps do I recall the urgency for this significant project. Really, why now? What’s the rush? The world will not come to an end if the mayor and his city council acolytes abate their rush to judgment. Who’s working for whom here?

The city’s plan is indisputably divisive. It created an extraordinary community reaction. Absent any compelling explanation for a burning need to refashion a unique and historic section of Alexandria, this could be an instance when doing nothing is the right choice.

Choosing this option will allow the advocates of competing waterfront plans time to explain how their proposals addresses important metrics. Foremost among these metrics must be quality of life, not for overnight visitors, but for permanent residents, particularly those directly affected by alterations to the waterfront.

Other, more easily quantifiable metrics include cost, traffic and density. Of all these, however, density is the real snake in the grass. Just as a glass can hold only so much fluid, so too can Alexandria hold only so many people, structures and vehicles before the quality of life atrophies from traffic congestion.

You don’t have to look far to see the consequences of densification. The Pentagon annex at Mark Center is but one. Our city officials approved it, but belatedly agreed with our congressional delegation that it was a mistake. It’s too massive a structure with too many people using too many cars to reach it.

To prevent the waterfront from becoming Mark Center, the city should forestall its rush. There is no burning urgency to reshape the waterfront now, or in the near future.

Tabling this vigorously contested initiative will defuse the city-caused fury among the residents City Hall was created to serve. After all, the elected and appointed public servants pushing their waterfront plan are not our lords and masters. It’s the other way ‘round.

Jim Roberts
Alexandria

Related Articles

Share

About Author

Alexandria Times Staff

(2) Readers Comments

  1. Thank you, Mr. Roberts for your insightful opinion.

    Let’s not make the “Alexandria Way” synonymous with government arrogance, government overreach and government incompetence.

    Mr. Vice Mayor, I frequently hear you state that Council was elected to “make decisions and move on”. On The Waterfront, please know Alexandrians did not elect our City Council just to “make decisions”. We elected you, in major part, as wizened benefactors of Alexandria City. You carry a heavy burden on this decision, especially given Council’s recent densification track record that has upset many.

    There is no rush here unless your want to clear the docket of this matter, and by so doing, concomitantly jeopardize our City’s credit rating. Like an overused credit card, we’re nearly maxed out.

    Let’s take our time on this hefty decision as many are suggesting.

  2. Mr. Roberts, I am sure you are familiar with due process. When all issues have been studied, analyzed, and options eliminated to form a solution, and all inputs, including citizen have been taken in, and appropriately applied (which they have), then it is time to vote., That is why we vote, to get Council to do just this. It has been done. I have not seen any new issues emerge for some time now. The only thing I have seening the press lately is mudslinging by the opponents to the City plan. This tells me they have given up on the merits of their position.The planning department has done a thorough job over several years to cover all issues and has producred a very balanced plan. It is time to vote.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

*