Driving Uber, Lyft out of the market


By Kathryn Watson (File photo)

Just when you thought the Department of Motor Vehicles could not get any less popular, Virginia’s DMV officials sent cease-and-desist letters to passenger carrier companies Uber and Lyft, urging them to stop doing business in the commonwealth.

Virginia’s DMV, which has already fined Uber and Lyft $26,000 and $9,000 respectively, says commonwealth law “requires for-hire passenger carriers to have proper operating authority,” and their business model — allowing passengers to conveniently look up driver ratings and connect with one such part-time driver of their choice via smart phone mobile apps — doesn’t fit the bill.

Since Virginia is reviewing its passenger carrier laws, DMV Commissioner Robert Holcomb told Uber and Lyft they should “focus (their) resources on participation in this study rather than continue illegal operations in the meantime,” in the letters.

Virginia’s move to immobilize Uber and Lyft puts it on par with cities like Los Angeles and San Francisco, where taxicab companies have wielded their influence to block competition.

“This is just the latest example of legislation getting in the way of entrepreneurship and innovation,” said Matthew Feeney, policy analyst with the Cato Institute. “If lawmakers in Virginia want Virginia to be an economically profitable and prosperous state, then they should welcome companies like Uber and Lyft, and not dissuade them from coming into Virginia.”

The DMV’s move wasn’t random.

Sunni Blevins Brown, spokeswoman for the state agency, confirmed that a “number of transportation companies, including taxis, have contacted DMV regarding this matter.”

And that, said Christopher Koopman, program manager for the Mercatus Center’s Project for the Study of American Capitalism at George Mason University, drives home the problem.

“These sorts of actions, they privilege existing firms and they stifle innovation and they limit consumer choice,” Koopman said. “In situations like this, regulations are being used to block the development of promising situations, products such as Uber that are market responsive, in a lot of ways, to issues that consumers have faced in the past. In a lot of ways firms like this pop up to respond to needs of consumers, and regulations act as barriers to entry. They make it more difficult and they make it more expensive for the entrepreneur or the innovator to provide higher quality services at a lower cost to consumers.”

The Virginia DMV, however, has gone even further than that.

According to The Virginian-Pilot, it’s circulating a notice that warns the public to research any ride service before using it and points riders to a website listing companies that have the DMV’s stamp of approval. Uber and Lyft didn’t make the cut.

The DMV insists it’s looking out for the best interest and safety of consumers, citing concerns over drivers’ level of insurance.

The free market, however, works out many of those safety concerns, said Feeney and Koopman.

“I think the technology that allows Uber and Lyft to work actually helps customers when it comes to things like safety,” Feeney said. “For example, Uber allows not only for the customers to rate drivers, but it also allows drivers to rate customers, which makes it safer for drivers and better for customers.”

Plus, Uber and Lyft perform background checks on their drivers, Feeney said.

Since companies like Uber rely on a ratings system, bad drivers are naturally weeded out and good drivers are rewarded with business, allowing consumers to make informed choices, Koopman said.

“When you get a cab, you don’t know what the record of the driver is like,” Koopman said. “You don’t know, is it going to be a good or a bad experience? But an innovation like Uber allows the consumer to know at least to a certain degree the type of driver they’re going to be dealing with.”

Uber isn’t giving up.

“The DMV’s actions … are shocking and unexpected,” the company said in a statement. “Uber has been providing Virginians with safe, affordable and reliable transportation options for months and has continued to work in good faith with the DMV to create a regulatory framework for ridesharing.

“The DMV decision today hurts thousands of small business entrepreneurs who rely on the Uber platform to make a living, create new jobs and contribute to the economy — and it hurts the countless residents who rely on Uber to connect them with affordable, safe and reliable transportation alternatives. We look forward to continuing to work with the Virginia DMV to find a permanent home for ridesharing in the commonwealth.”

Kathryn Watson is an investigative reporter for Watchdog.org’s Virginia Bureau, and can be reached at kwatson@watchdog.org, or on Twitter @kathrynw5.




    In addition to the California Public Utilities Commission (CPUC)
    threat of imminent license suspension against UBER and Lyft
    for doing illegal runs at airports, and new CPUC stringent
    insurance regulations for TNC’s, here is some more bad news
    for the bad boys at UBER:

    1) Major strikes and disruptions all across Europe

    Cab drivers in Europe protest against Uber, other ride-share services

    2) Cab drivers in Chicago call Mayor Rahm Emanuel (UBER-lover)
    a hypocrite.

    3) Respected bean-counter assails UBER’s ridiculous claims of
    drivers making $90,000/yr.



    4) UBER gets nailed with $100,000 fine in Pennsylvania.



    5) CNBC Trashes UBER

    CNBC Interview – Robbie Werth – The Uber Argument



    6) Miami-Dade rips into UBER scumbags



    7) UBER drivers street demonstrations against the beast



    8) States where UBER Insurance has been declared fraudulent



    9) California Insurance Companies Demand UBER Get Regular Taxi Insurance

    Insurers say ride-sharing services should get same coverage as taxis – Los Angeles Times

    10) Los Angeles City Council Members Join Massive Anti-UBER Protest Demonstration

    Councilmembers, Taxi Drivers Protest Ridesharing Apps At City Hall « CBS Los Angeles


    All in all, a very bad week for the liars, crooks and
    thieves at UBER.

    Enjoy your weekend


    Joe L. Jordan, Editor
    Limoinsider Report
    14173 Northwest Freeway #166
    Houston TX 77040

    713 680-3181

  2. “safe, affordable and reliable transportation” ?
    Uber can’t be serious….
    Has no adequate insurance,
    Has no municipal permits to operate as a business in public transportation.
    Claims in courts to NOT be a transportation company.
    Has been caught many times to be lying and misrepresenting facts to its own advantage.
    Complete lack of safety – just a few days a go a young woman was kidnapped by uber driver:

  3. Well, if the author Kathryn would have done any decent homework before writing this piece, she would find SERIOUS issues with companies like Uber, Lyft that DO put the public’s safety at risk.

    A key issue that wasn’t talked about is both of those companies are depending on their drivers to use their personal auto insurance as the primary, which will become VOID upon an accident since it does not cover commercial activities. All those companies offer is a lame secondary insurance that only acts off the drivers insurance, which again will get cancelled when they find out they were using it for livery purposes.

    So, why are these companies worth now billions but not offering to protect its drivers with FULL PRIMARY COMMERCIAL INSURANCE? Whomever drive or rides in these illegally-insured cars is truly taking their financial future at risk.

    The state DMV is just trying to safeguard against under insured drivers and other shortcuts that Uber, Lyft are trying to get around. If you can’t see those errors, you need to do your homework on this issuand become more informed.