Applying the same rules to cyclists as motorists is nonsensical and dangerous

8
2301
Applying the same rules to cyclists as motorists is nonsensical and dangerous
Facebooktwittermail

By Matt Harris, Alexandria

At a recent city council public hearing the topic of bike lanes was discussed. Bicycle opponents called for stepping up punishment of cyclists who ignore traffic laws.

As both a cyclist and a motor vehicle driver, applying laws enacted to regulate motorized vehicles to bicyclists is like trying to fit the proverbial square peg into a round hole — both the motorist and the cyclist will be disadvantaged.

As a motorist, nothing irks me more than being behind a cyclist who is turning left.  Not only does the cyclist disrupt the general flow of traffic, but the cyclist is in the perilous and nerve-racking position of facing approaching traffic as well as drivers passing on their right.  As a cyclist, I find it better to ride through an intersection and cross the street when traffic either abates or when I “have” the traffic light. This is safer for me and means that faster moving automobile traffic is not impeded.

At other times, cyclists may be safer and pose less of a hindrance to motor vehicles by hopping a curb or engaging in acts that are contrary to the rules of the road.

While bicycling in traffic I am most concerned with lazy and inattentive drivers. I understand that the act of using one’s turn signal may be felt to constitute a form of aerobic exercise by some, but for the cyclist, the lack of a signal can be a matter of life or death.  I make every effort to ride defensively and feel safest riding as near to the curb as possible — remaining on the lookout for car doors opening suddenly and evading roadside debris.

If a car behind me has its right turn signal on, I will either speed up to get out of the turning car’s path, or will slow down to avoid being in the turning car’s blind-spot.  Within the past year, I’ve seen two cyclists wind up on the pavement because of negligent right-turning cars.

Biking should be encouraged in the city for a multitude of reasons. Yet rigidly applying traffic rules on cyclists does not serve the best or safest interests of either the driving or cycling public. I would suggest that cyclists have more of an incentive to avoid accidents with cars than cars have with cyclists, and that cyclists are necessarily the more vigilant of the two.

Facebooktwittermail
instagram