Updating streets for multiple uses requires a new board

2
1082
Updating streets for multiple uses requires a new board
Facebooktwittermail

By Jake Jakubek, Alexandria
(File Photo)

To the editor:

On November 25, the city traffic and parking board deferred a proposal to add bike lanes to King Street just west of the Metro station, asking for further review. In so doing, the board ignored the hard work that city staff has done to implement the city policy known as complete streets, which was approved in 2011.

The term “complete streets” describes a comprehensive, integrated transportation network designed to allow safe and convenient travel along and across streets for all users, including pedestrians, bicyclists, motorists and users of public transportation. The director of transportation and environmental services implements the policy, for example, by reviewing the safety of a street when it’s scheduled for repaving and making changes as warranted.

In Alexandria, boards and commissions exist so resident representatives can advise city staff and/or city council on broad areas, such as the environmental policy commission and the parks and recreation commission. In the case of complete streets, there is no corresponding board or commission with responsibility for “safe and convenient travel for all.”

Instead, a traffic and parking board is responsible for reviewing requests for changes to parking — just one of several uses of our public streets. A board for an individual category of street use, such as parking, is inefficient at best.

Why not create a board with responsibility “for the safe and convenient travel along and across streets for all users,” rather than retaining a board out of touch with city policies and not aligned with the city’s multimodal transportation and complete-streets objectives?

 

instagram
Facebooktwittermail